Don't be clever, kid

He's the most clever kid in the class, more clever than some teachers, more articulate, more aware of the world, ready to argue a point and passionately defend a ridiculous idea, an idea that only a teenager could support. He's so intelligent, in fact, that you know the rest: he's bored. Unmotivated. Lazy even. Doesn't turn in work, falls asleep in class, checks his phone all too often.

As is the case with clever kids around the world, he is the one who might not graduate. He's the one who gets zeros on work he would've gotten hundreds on, if he had bothered to do it. He's the one that could pass an AP or IB exam without taking the course, who reads for pleasure. Who is curious.

And he's the one who will fail and won't graduate on time. Why is this? Because his teachers are personally offended.

At a recent meeting, teachers shrugged: Yeah, he'll have to go to summer school. We're so sick of his shit.

Meanwhile, I brought up the name of someone who really shouldn't graduate, a senior who cannot read or write, who also sleeps or is distracted, who scores in the bottom quarter of any standardized exam. "I don't see how this guy could possibly graduate," I said.

"Oh, he's fine," I heard. "He'll squeak by like he always does."

"Squeaks by" means he's a little mouse. Cute. Quiet, usually. No trouble, really. Deals with crumbs of information. Leaves behind evidence -- homework turned in on time, a test paper with a name on top and two out of twenty questions attempted. In other words, he's there.

This is how to get by in school and in life. Show up. Do the minimal. Don't make any noise. Don't offend.

Meanwhile, Clever Kid is participating in university debates (he's ineligible for his high school debate team because of grades) and helping organize an international book fair. Meanwhile, he is deemed a failure.

I spoke to one of his former teachers, someone I respect, to find out how it is possible to for Clever Kid to fail and Mouse to pass.

"He has let too many people down," Respected Teacher said. "One day he'll let down someone he loves. Or maybe himself."

And it took me a while, but I finally understood: It's really about the adults and not the children. We often judge our students by our own failures. We fail to teach or motivate students and so they get the F. Or we fail them because they're too much like us.

Respected Teacher told me a story about himself: When he was a university student, a professor took him aside and warned him that he would some day let someone down. Years later, he had a chance to be published in a major magazine, messed around, missed the deadline, and was told he would never be invited to write for that magazine again. Lesson learned, Respected Teacher cleaned up his act, became a better person because of the experience, and now passes on that lesson to colleagues and teenagers alike.

The problem is this: Respected Teacher learned his lesson as an adult; he expects Clever Kid to understand the same lesson as a teen.

Clever Kid is getting a B in my class, and Mouse is getting a D-. I guess I'm too easy. I accept late work, grade students on what they know and can do. And the thing is, Clever Kid doesn't know everything and can't do everything. He might do better if I freed him to learn how he wants.

Recently my class was talking about a character in a novel, about the character's philosophy. The character said that he respects China because it is a "freedom-loving" country that has never been colonized by a foreign power. I saw Clever Kid typing away on his phone. Just as I was about to follow school policy (take away the phone, punish the student!), he looked up from his Google results and said, "He's wrong. China was once colonized."

And just like that, the class discussion took a turn towards the dangerous territory of actual learning. Can we trust this character? Does the character know what he's talking about? Why would the author do this? What's the point?

One point, I suppose, with the characters in novels and in classrooms, is that imperfections make us human. None of us will get it right every time. 

Grit and other character strengths

One of the highlights of my school year was when three of my seniors cried. About my assignment.

The students found me at lunch one day midway through the first semester. “We didn’t know it would be this hard,” one of them said. “We’re thinking about quitting this whole thing ... but we don’t want to quit.”

I asked him to slow down and explain what was happening. My students had just finished reading Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go, a dystopian novel where clones are raised like normal children until they’re old enough to have their organs harvested. The assignment had students research human cloning and then debate some of the issues raised. In groups, they campaigned for and against the use of human clones, making posters, spreading their messages on Facebook and Twitter, and presenting their views to the rest of the school during homeroom time. We were planning a school-wide vote on the issue, and both sides wanted to win, until one of the groups hit an unexpected snag.

“The teachers are arguing against us,” the student explained. Their group was representing the “yes” side -- governments should allow this kind of cloning program. “We expected to get some questions and arguments from students, but not teachers.”

“Yeah, and we want to tell them that it’s only an assignment, that we don’t even agree with the position, but we don’t want to ruin it. But they won’t even let us finish. They just shout at us and tell us how immoral we are,” added another student before bursting into tears.

I broke into a big smile. “I’m sorry,” I said. “I’m not trying to make you feel bad by laughing, but this actually makes me feel happy.” They looked at me, stunned. “Can’t you see? People are taking this seriously, which means you’re doing a good job. Plus, you’re getting a taste of what it feels like to stand up for an unpopular position. You’re learning!”

They didn’t look so sure, so I promised to send out a staff email, asking teachers not to interfere. My email was a little strong -- “remember this is only an English class assignment” -- but I later realized I really should have thanked my colleagues, especially the ones challenging my students. They were helping my students develop grit.

Grit, according to Angela Duckworth’s TED talk, “is passion and perseverance for very long-term goals.” Duckworth, a University of Pennsylvania psychologist, has found that grit helps people succeed academically and professionally, more so than IQ, social intelligence, or other qualities. She has also discovered that grit is difficult to teach. “What I do know is that talent doesn’t make you gritty,” she said.

I’ve been pondering the importance of grit and other character strengths, especially whenever I hear stories of former star students who do not do well in their studies beyond high school. So when the students cried about the teachers’ reactions to their project but decided to continue presenting, I thought to myself, “Maybe they’re building up their perseverance.”

I recently asked some of my students to take the VIA Youth Survey to see which character strengths are more pronounced in my classroom of Korean students studying in an international school with an American curriculum. After completing the survey, students identified their top five strengths and answered some questions. The results revealed patterns and left me wondering about how my school could address the gaps.

The 24 strengths are arranged in six categories: wisdom, courage, humanity, justice, temperance, and transcendence. The all-important perseverance falls under courage, along with bravery, honesty, and vitality. It turned out that, of my 48 students, only three listed perseverance as one of their top five strengths; not only that, those three have all had lived overseas at some point in their lives for more than one academic semester. The same numbers were repeated for the strength leadership.

Despite the small sample size of my survey, these statistics raise several questions. First, is it possible that a semester abroad helped my students build up perseverance and leadership? Or are students with these strengths more likely to live and study abroad? More importantly, however, I wonder if my school should do anything with this information. If it is true that perseverance is important and our students lack it, should we work to build it? I have the same question about leadership – like many international schools, my school claims to build “twenty-first century leaders” – can we do anything differently to build this strength?

What my students lack in perseverance they make up in “appreciation of beauty and excellence” – 14 students listed it as one of their top five strengths. Perhaps this points to a potentially large number of artistic students in my school, which leads to more questions: Are artistic students somehow drawn to this school, or does the school do something to build this strength? In either case, if it is true that the school has students with this strength, should we focus on it and build the arts program? Or should we focus more energy on those strengths that appear to be missing?

I recently posed these questions to an administrator who had spent six years at the school. He agreed that the school's student population seems to lack perseverance (“Maybe all high-income students do,” he said) but thought their strengths should be celebrated and developed. “It's important to work on weaknesses, but I feel we overemphasize the importance of that in education,” he said, “and then we just end up pointing out all the problems with our kids, instead of spending more energy and time helping their strengths become even more prominent.”

We discussed the difficulties in teaching grit and laughed about the time some twelfth grade students cried because of my assignment. A situation like that, he said, “allows them to show their grit naturally.”

In fact, the students pushed on with the assignment. Their team lost the school-wide vote but won a moral victory when voters said the pro-clones campaign was more memorable than the anti-clones one. Interestingly, the student who had brought the complaint to me several months ago was one of the very few students at the school to list “leadership” as one of his top five strengths. It's possible, I thought, that the assignment had helped him develop that strength; at the very least, it allowed him to use his leadership skills naturally.

I now have more questions than answers about what to teach and how, but I will continue attempting to create assignments that will raise passions and, perhaps, build some character strengths along the way.

Recipe for success

One of my classes has been working on Cause and Effect writing. To make things somewhat interesting, I first asked students to list something they're good at and then write a quick essay explaining how someone else can become good at it. One student selected baking, another illustrating. A boy decided to be interesting by writing about raising dragons (well, bearded dragons, to be exact). And two boys thought they'd have some fun by revealing, in one case, how to trick teachers into thinking that you're paying attention when you're really not, and in the other, how to do well without paying attention.

As is always the case, this kind of assignment reveals so much more than you'd expect. First, that students recognize bad teaching and can easily outsmart lazy teachers. "Students can sleep or doodle during class and later copy down friends' notes after class," one wrote. "This helps students' grades because in some classes, note-taking is summative. Summative note-taking is annoying."

And speaking of required note-taking, the other student wrote that you can trick teachers into thinking that you care by writing something, anything, in your notebook. "What you write doesn't matter at all," he wrote. "It can be a complaint or something else. However, it's important to write in medium-small letters using weird handwriting so that teachers won't try to look at your notes very closely."

So of course, as always, students quickly figure out which assignments are BS and act accordingly. Even supposedly hard-working Korean kids.

Students also know what it takes to succeed at something, even if they don't necessarily connect success with school work. The students who wrote about being good at baking and illustrating both wrote about the importance of practice. "There are some people that have the 'god's hand,' who have true aptitude in drawing," one of them wrote. "However, those kinds of illustrators can be found once in a blue moon. Most illustrators are mainly composed of people who practice hard. They draw pictures all day until their fingers become paralyzed. ... It doesn't matter whether your drawings are good or bad. If you practice more and more, your drawing skills will develop."

Exactly, I wanted to yell out as I was reading this. In fact, the students were in the middle of sustained silent reading as I was glancing through their essays. I eventually interrupted their reading. 

"You guys all know the secret to becoming good readers and writers," I said. 

"Let me guess, practice," said one of the boys who knows how to trick teachers.

"Yup," I said. "You do exactly that with things you love. And if you did the same with schoolwork, you'd easily succeed."

"But who wants to read or write for two hours a day?" another boy said. He admitted he practices on the piano at least that much. He's brilliant.

"I especially love one paragraph in this essay about baking," I told them. "Listen to this, and in your head, imagine this is about writing."

The most important thing is that we need a lot of practice to bake well. For example, I could bake a chocolate sheet after having three failures, and I could make a tiramisu after having four failures. It is natural to fail many times before baking well, and we will get better and better as we practice more and more. There are many skills in baking, which we can use after being able to do the basic things easily and properly. After practicing and when we can do the basic things properly, we can move on to the next skill. For example, we can improve quality of chocolate by tempering, but before tempering, we should be able to melt the chocolate well, being able to control the temperature so that the chocolate wouldn’t be changed. More and more practice means better and higher quality dessert.

The students pointed out that baking is completely different from school, because failure when baking is OK. It means you're learning.

"If you fail four times in school and then get one good grade, you still fail," I was informed.

And this is when I reminded them that they can revise an essay as many times as they want, until they succeed, and that the last grade is the one that counts. I also reminded them that, just like in baking, there are many skills they are learning in my class, and they can improve the individual skills through practice and failure.

"See what I mean?" I asked. They dutifully nodded their heads. Maybe they understood my point and are now willing to practice. Then again, one of the boys had written, ""If you make a very profound expression and look at the teacher or your book, the teacher will think that you are concentrating and learning and will think that you care. You might even earn some good grades using this method."

Positive or negative? It depends

My students are fascinated -- and baffled -- by stories of American university life. They're a small group of Koreans, their English isn't perfect, but they have opinions that make me appreciate their cultural wisdom and question my philosophy of education.

A recent assignment had my ESL Writing class read a simple cause-and-effect essay titled "Why College Students Are Poor." In it, the author describes college students as shabbily dressed individuals who work part-time jobs or make sacrifices in order to get a degree, hoping that their efforts will pay off in the long run. One of the questions was: Does the author have a positive or negative view of college students?

"Negative," one of the students responded. "He says that college students wear old pants or jeans and T-shirts."

"Really, you think so?" I pointed at another student: "How about you?"

"I think negative, too. The introduction describes them as poor. They eat pizza and drive used cars."

Our discussion quickly got sidetracked as I told them a popular fashion choice in college: the baseball cap, put on when rolling out of bed ten minutes before class. The kids were amused and said that Korean college students dress fashionably and wear lots of makeup. 

We returned to the essay. "What about the conclusion?" I asked. "What does the author say is the students' motivation? Do you still think he has a negative view?"

"He says they hope the education will pay off, so that means he's not so sure," the class contrarian said. "That doesn't sound very positive."

Little by little, they started to convince me. Not that the author has a negative view of college students, but that a lot of things Americans do seems a little wrong.

"Why do they have part-time jobs anyway?" a student asked. "Why don't they spend their time studying?"

"Because they have to pay for school," I said. They were shocked to learn that more than half of American students take out loans to pay for school, which they then pay off in subsequent decades.

"It makes sense that, if you are independent and have a good job, you should pay for everything," the contrarian said. "But we believe that education is the responsibility of the parents."

We believe. He wasn't speaking for his classmates. He was speaking for his entire country. His culture.

It must be nice to have cultural norms. Expectations. Beliefs that even middle school students understand about life. In the U.S., there are some abstractions -- we believe that all men are created equal and something about pursuing happiness -- but what about the responsibilities of every mother and father? what about the responsibilities of the government to its people, or basic rights like education? What are the priorities of the country?

Koreans perhaps are unhealthily obsessed with education. After-school academies until late night. Standardized test preparation. Insistence on brand-name colleges. All of it is expensive, and all of it is shouldered by the families. Is it sustainable? Maybe not, but neither is the trillion-dollar debt in the U.S. 

Ultimately, I was unable to convince the students that the author has a positive view of college students. How could I? I certainly couldn't convince them that graduating with an average debt of $30,000 is somehow a good way to start adult life.

The problem for me now is that I had previously insisted to this same group of students that there are definitely right and wrong answers in English class. But how can I say that something is right when that answer is so wrong in so many ways?

How to get students to cheat less and hike more

Thinking Chapter 4: The Associative Machine

As I was reading Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow, I realized that it's not just a book about how the brain works and makes decisions. It's about teaching. In every chapter, there is at least one revelation about what goes on in the brains of all those classroom characters. And so, I'll try to make some connections, to ponder recent psychological and neuroscientific findings in order to become a better teacher. Sometimes I'll be wrong. Sometimes I'll miss something important. But hopefully I'll hit on something important or interesting from time to time.

To begin the exploration of priming students to succeed, look at the following words:

homecoming         standardized exam

A lot happened to you during the last second or two. You experienced some unpleasant images and memories. Your face twisted in an expression of disgust, and you may have imperceptibly moved away from the computer. Your heart rate increased, the hair on your arms rose a little, and your sweat glands were activated. In short, you responded to something disgusting with an attenuated version of how you would react to the actual event. All of this was completely automatic, beyond your control.

OK, sorry, I basically copied the opening of Kahneman's chapter, except I changed his words (banana, vomit). This is a blog about teaching after all, and nothing is more disgusting and vomit-worthy than standardized exams.

This is one of the more exciting early chapters with potential implications for the classroom. First, Kahneman explains a little how the association of ideas works. If you come across an unpleasant idea, such as standardized exams, your mind and body react both consciously and in silent, hidden ways. He then explains the marvels of priming: if you were asked to complete the word fragment SO_P, your response would be different depending if you were first primed with WASH or EAT. From here it gets complicated, but also really intriguing.

Kahneman describes one experiment that got college students to walk slower because they had first been primed with words associated with the elderly. Just being exposed to words like Florida, forgetful, and bald got young people to slow down. That got me thinking, can students be primed for some long-term actions? For example, could they become interested in hiking if classroom walls were covered in pictures of beautiful forest trails? Could they be convinced to volunteer with pictures of orphanages or soup kitchens? No words, no messages, just pictures. And then a random announcement: we're planning a hike; sign up in the office. Could it work?

Kahneman continues by explaining that reciprocal priming effects produce a coherent reaction. By thinking about old age, people act old, and acting old reinforces thoughts of old age. The same is true with being amused and smiling: one reciprocates the other. Even nodding your head makes you more likely to agree with a message. These ideas point to the use of humor in the classroom. By laughing, students are more likely to be amused by a lesson, which in turn makes them feel positive about it. This is all common sense, but I wonder if it would be possible to trick students into being more agreeable. What if, for example, throughout the lesson, I tell students to nod if they hear me? Just that. Every ten minutes or so, nod if you hear me. Of course they'll nod (because I speak loudly), but by getting them to do that, can I alter their perception of whatever the lesson is actually about? It's worth a shot; at the very least, all the nodding will keep them from nodding off.

Kahneman presents other examples of priming effects. For example, people who have money on their minds (perhaps they saw a dollar-bill screen saver or a stack of Monopoly money) become more selfish, help less, and want to sit further away from strangers than people who have not been primed with money. This makes me wonder how various primes in a classroom might affect students. If there are posters of various universities, will students connect every task to their goal of getting into a great university? If so, would they be more or less likely to cheat on assignments and tests? Would they be more or less willing to help other students? Obviously I don't know the answers, but I think it's important to be aware that even the most innocent messages might have a profound effect on students, whether or not they are aware of it.

One possible way to reduce cheating is posters of eyes. Kahneman explains an experiment that changed how much people were willing to pitch in for coffee in an office: on alternating weeks, large pictures were hung in the room, either of flowers or eyes. There was a big increase in the amount people left during the weeks with pictures of eyes. Subconsciously, people thought someone was watching. I wonder if this would work in the classroom. Students want to peek at a neighbor's paper, but they sense eyes watching ...

The fact that primes work is not up for debate, according to Kahneman, who says, "You have no choice but to accept that the major conclusions of these studies are true. More important, you must accept that they are true about you" (57). If so, then it seems important that schools are set up in ways that would prime students to succeed, whether that's studying harder or volunteering more or simply getting out into the wilderness for a hike.

Why schools shouldn't eliminate junk food

Thinking Chapter 3: The Lazy Controller, part 2

One of my former colleagues used to meet her advisory group students before they headed in for dreaded standardized exams. She'd hand each a packet of snacks -- candy bars, a juice drink, maybe a piece of fruit. Needless to say, her students loved her. She said she wanted to make sure each of them had some food, knowing full well that students freak out on exam days and forget things like breakfast. Turns out she was also probably helping them get higher scores.

According to Kahneman, research has shown "conclusively" that tasks like the SAT and ACT drain people. "[A]n effort of will or self-control is tiring; if you have had to force yourself to do something, you are less willing or less able to exert self-control when the next challenge comes around. The phenomenon has been named ego depletion" (41-42). If you think about it, sitting in place for many hours bubbling in Scranton pages is an unbelievable effort of will and self-control for most teens. Furthermore, "[a]fter exerting self-control in one task, you do not feel like making an effort in another." This explains why many students start strong and noticeably slow down during an exam (proctor one of the exams and you'll see). It turns out that the nervous system, especially when involved in effortful mental activity, consumes glucose: "When you are actively involved in difficult cognitive reasoning or engaged in a task that requires self-control, your blood glucose level drops" (43). Researchers have also confirmed that "the effects of ego depletion could be undone by ingesting glucose."

The implications of this go beyond having students eat a candy bar during a break in the exam. Teachers marking papers also suffer ego depletion. A study found that judges were most likely to grant parole immediately after a food break and least likely immediately before a break. Were the judges simply being nice because they felt content after a meal, or were they harsh because they were hungry? In either case, these findings point to the importance of taking many breaks while marking papers.

Maybe being glued to a computer screen late into the night isn't a bad thing

Thinking* Chapter 3: The Lazy Controller, part 1

There are many reasons why electives such as Journalism and Yearbook are so important ... and fun to teach, which is why I think all classes should be more like them. For one, these are two classes that create products that are distributed to the school and wider community, that become records of the school year. How many classes require students to do real work that is then seen and critiqued by an actual audience? Not enough. Speaking of being seen, publications get everyone in the school actually reading, hopefully getting the young and old into the habit of picking up professional newspapers and magazines. Another reason is that everyone loves to talk about the importance of critical thinking skills (without ever really defining them), and producing a school newspaper or yearbook requires those skills -- students don't discuss critical thinking in some abstract way; instead, they discuss, debate, investigate, and make decisions about big ideas. Student leaders get a chance to practice real leadership, staff members get a chance to collaborate and stretch their creativity, and administrators get taken to task for decisions and policies. What I love best about teaching these courses is what is known as flow.

Several years ago, on the day before deadline, students decided they would stay in the computer lab after school until they were done. They were working on issue 1 of the new year, and the new editors vowed to improve on last year's group who had missed the monthly deadline a couple of times. The design editor hooked up his computer to the projector so that others could see what he was doing. The editor in chief alternated between her screen and the classroom's big screen, snapping instructions for headline sizes and photo placement. The copy editor, curled up in a corner of the room, shouting occasional frustrations at articles submitted earlier that day: "What's the matter with these people? Don't they know how to use quotation marks?" The photo editor, oblivious to the hustle and bustle around her, sat with headphones on, patiently cropping and improving images. Hours passed, and work continued. When it all appeared complete, everyone gathered around the big screen, carefully examining each page and rushing to their own computers when someone spotted a mistake. No one was tired. No one needed to go home. Good thing it was Friday, because they finished well after midnight.

I've observed similar scenarios at different schools -- at an inner city Chicago school, a boarding school in India, an elite international school in England. Each time, when a group of committed students with a shared goal get together, they work. In the moment, they're not worried about grades or college applications or future contests. They're worried about putting together the best possible publication they can. In Thinking, Fast and Slow, Kahneman introduces psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi's concept of flow, which is when people "expend considerable effort for long periods of time without having to exert willpower" (40). While experiencing flow, people "lose their sense of time, of themselves, of their problems." I've seen it many times, and it's interesting how the same teenagers who can be described as lazy or apathetic by some teachers all of a sudden gain focus and willpower when working on a real task.

Surely a very small percentage of any group of students would experience flow in Journalism class, but there are many activities across the disciplines that can grab students similarly. This is why I believe students should do real work in their classes. They should do the work of scientists, historians, mathematicians -- whatever that work is, as long as it's real. Not all students will become passionate about all (or even most) of their subjects, but wouldn't it be something if many students could regularly experience flow in the classroom? In order to help students become passionate about something, it is important to find passionate teachers. The most impressive question I've ever been asked at an interview -- the question that made me think that I want to work for this principal -- was this: What excites you about your subject? If teachers are excited, students will be swept up, and the only problem we'll have to worry about is making evening phone calls home to explain that we're almost finished with this month's work.